Yeah we'd still have a long tail of sites making very little but when I ran a small blog with daily posts I barely made $100 in a year from Google ads. That's quite a lot of buying power I'd say. ![]() If there were 100M active Brave users imagine a billion dollars being spent by them every month. I just gave out 5 BAT tips to a dozen publishers - that's more than I've ever paid directly for non-video content on the web (not including buying digital books either). But with a large number of consumers feeding even $10 back into the system to pay for content that would be a huge impact IMO. So ideally shitty sites full of ads and click bait will be punished and wither away (or do really well because some people love that click bait and want more of it - whatever).īut I'd be really surprised if in a world where a substantial percentage of users are using Brave whether anyone would be make much more than $10 a month looking at ads - even that would probably require watching thousands of ads per month. Then consumers can decide who to reward or not which is a better incentive for quality content providers. However by skimming off some of the ad-revenue that normally goes to intermediaries or direct to the publisher it puts consumers directly into the loop. ![]() ![]() That's not at all the economics BAT is looking for - ideally ad revenue would be just enough to pay for the content you consume in the form of micropayments. I think people are under the misconception they are going to make hundreds or even things of dollars just sitting at home surfing the web.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |